Using LEED on Laboratory Projects

by Deepa Tolat and Daniel Watch
Perkins + Will

Last updated: 09-18-2007

Introduction

The USGBC (U.S. Green Building Council) has implemented the LEED® (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) program to encourage clients and professionals to design, build, and operate more environmentally appropriate buildings. LEED goals are organized into six categories:

This Resource Page focuses on LEED issues that impact the owner, the architectural/engineering team, and the contractor working on laboratory building projects.

For the owner, an overview of the issues that specifically affect them and information that clarifies potential cost ramifications are provided.

Possible solutions to these challenges are identified through architectural/engineering design ideas discussed in this Resource Page, many of which have been considered good design for some time. Others reflect a change in the marketplace due to the LEED process and a basic understanding of potential initial cost, as well as payback analysis for some items. Also identified are solutions that provide a higher quality laboratory building but may have costs difficult to quantify.

The third area of focus is the contractor. Some solutions provided in this Resource Page indicate how to address LEED specifications or formulate a contract that encourages the contractor to be proactive. Items that must be determined, addressed, and documented by the contractor primarily during the construction phase are specified as well.

Description

1. Sustainable Sites

While the solutions for Sustainable Sites usually have little impact on the contractor, they do impact the client/owner and the architectural/engineering team.

For the client/owner, a total of 14 of 69 points are achievable in this category. In fact, most projects receive at least 75% of these points because they are usually attainable without adding to the initial construction cost. For example, many points are achieved because of the program and site, not because of a LEED goal. Items such as Site Selection (SS Credit 1), Urban Redevelopment (SS Credit 2), Brownfield Redevelopment (SS Credit 3), Alternative Transportation (SS Credit 4), and Reduced Site Disturbance (SS Credit 5) are usually determined by the owner because of an existing campus and buildings or a preselected building site. There are, however, some design opportunities that have modest construction cost and potential paybacks during operational costs.

The architectural/engineering team has a range of design options that impact a sustainable site. For example, in the section on alternative transportation, bicycle storage and changing rooms (SS Credit 4.2), a solution can be reached if bike storage and changing rooms are provided in an adjacent building or within the new project. Since many laboratory projects require a changing area for the researchers, this is addressed in the design phase. And while bike racks may add a modest cost to the project (approximately $5,000), it has a qualitative payback.

Sustainable sites where 14 points are achieved

Other areas where the A/E team can provide design solutions include:

SS Credit 6.1 and 6.2: storm water management-case study

See WBDG Achieving Sustainable Site Design through Low Impact Development Practices, Low Impact Development Technologies, Extensive Green Roofs.

2. Water Efficiency

Many of the ideas in this category have been developed because of the push for more sustainable buildings in the last 5+ years by the government, nonprofit, and private entities. For the client/owner, efficient design solutions improve the overall quality of the building with modest initial construction costs with less than five years for the operational payback.

WE Credit 3.1 and 3.2: water use reduction 20%/30%

Water Efficient Landscaping (WE Credits 1.1 and 1.2) can be achieved with a smart condensate recovery design by the A/E team. In most wet lab buildings, there is a significant amount of condensate generated from the air handlers. The condensate is generated during hot periods when the air-conditioning is necessary to cool spaces. The hot time of the year is usually the dry time in most parts of the country meaning the availability of condensate is at an opportune time.

Water Use Reduction (WE Credits 3.1 and 3.2) is very difficult to achieve in most laboratory buildings because of the need for cooling equipment with chilled water, requirements for safety showers and eyewashes, as well as general use needs in the labs. Vivarium facilities with cage wash systems and sterilizers will also use a tremendous amount of water.

See WBDG Water Conservation.

3. Energy and Atmosphere

The Energy & Atmosphere section focuses primarily on engineering issues and solutions based on building systems working together for a more comprehensive solution. Computer modeling is an important, efficient way to study and evaluate how various ideas impact other systems by examining different options based on the A/E team's recommendations. It should be completed at the end of schematic design, since the team will need time to develop some conceptual ideas and a preliminary design solution. The process usually takes two to four weeks, enabling decisions on building systems to be finalized before getting too far in the design development phase.

DOE-2 Computer Modeling and Payback Analysis

The University of Minnesota Molecular and Cellular Biology Building is a 243,000 gross square-foot facility located on the University of Minnesota East Bank campus. Northern States Power Company developed a DOE-2 model, a sophisticated energy performance simulation program. The energy cost is estimated at $1,406,353 per year at code level. The following is a list of issues that resulted from the study with the design team involved.

  1. Heat recovery saves the most dollars because of the large amount of heat required and the relatively high cost of University of Minnesota steam; it saves relatively few kW however (8.0 peak savings), as most of the savings is in heating energy ($309,933 annual energy savings).
  2. Improving the chiller efficiency saves the most kW (403.4) and a relatively large amount of energy dollars as well ($46,348).
  3. Variable speed drives decreased fan static, day lighting and lab variable air volume also show strong kW savings potential (218.4), but relatively less dollar savings ($39,843).

Engineering options are extremely important for most laboratory buildings because they are energy 'hogs'. The typical wet laboratory uses five-times as much energy and water per square-foot as the typical office building because of intensive ventilation requirements and other health and safety concerns.

Research laboratories are energy demanding for a variety of reasons:

Examining energy and water requirements from the holistic building perspective can identify significant opportunities to improve efficiencies while continuing to meet or exceed health and safety standards. New technologies not yet on the market should be evaluated in order to take advantage of them once they become more affordable. Such technologies include fuel cells, photovoltaic panels and super insulating windows.

Optimizing Energy Performance (EA Credit 1)

Design opportunities for optimizing energy performance are worth considering, including:

EA Credit 1.1 to 1.5: optimize energy performance-displacement ventilation

Computer modeling will reveal information vital to laboratory design because of the complexity of the building type. Some solutions are not appropriate for all laboratories. For example:

The following are some design guidelines to consider:

Code Minimum Requirements

ParameterValueSourceStandardDesign Target
Ventilation20 cfm/personASHRAE 62/89sameMaximize outdoor air by using displacement ventilation
Deliver air low/ exhaust high
Filtrationnone 35-80%65% pre-filter
85% final filter
Indoor Design Temperature75F summer
72F winter
 same 
Humidity ControlNA  50% RH summer
40% RH winter
Equipment Heat DissipationNA 3-4W/ sf1.5W/ sf or 2W/ sf with 75% diversity factor
Toilet Exhaust50cfm/ fixtureASHRAE 62/89same2 cfm/ sf
Lighting Power LoadsNA 2W/ sf
All direct
0.5-0.75W/ sf
Total task/ ambient with Occupancy sensors & Daylight sensors
Lighting Loads100 ft candles same20-30 ft candles with Ambient and task lighting
Building Shell Infiltration6 /100 sfASHRAE3 /100 sf1.5 /100 sf
(Canadian Standard)
Building Shell Infiltration (alternate)0.80 cfm/ sf 0.30 cfm/ sf0.10 cfm/ sf
Exterior Wall InsulationU= 0.28 btu/
sf-hr F
BOCA Energy CodeU=0.10 btuU= 0.15 btu/ sf-hr South
U=0.05 btu/ sf-hr N,E, W
Exterior Wall Moisture Control   A/B-With insulation both sides
Roof InsulationU= 0.07 btu/ sf-hrBOCA Energy CodeU=0.05 btu/ sf-hrU= 0.05 btu/ sf-hr with low surfacing
Windows    
Glazing typesingle/ clear double/ clearheat reflecting clear
Visible transmittance0.800.780.70 
Shading Coefficient1.000.800.43 
U value1.040.480.30 
Heating Degree Days6,155 btuASHRAEsamedetermined by DOE2 analysis of TMY data

See WBDG Building Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV), Cool Metal Roofing, Daylighting, Distributed Energy Resources (DER), Electric Lighting Controls, Energy Efficient Lighting, Extensive Green Roofs, Fuel Cell Technology, High-Performance HVAC, Microturbines, Natural Ventilation, Passive Solar Heating, Sun Control and Shading Devices, Windows and Glazing.

Additional Commissioning (EA Credit 3)

For complex wet laboratories additional commissioning is necessary to ensure the HVAC system is balanced properly, that daily operational maintenance processes are implemented properly, and that all safety requirements are met.

The commissioning is an important area that the entire team—including the contractor—needs to understand and buy into during the programming phase. Additional Commissioning is one of the few LEED points that requires early commitment. The initial cost is paid back to owners of laboratory facilities in usually less than three years.

See WBDG Project Planning, Management & Delivery: Building Commissioning.

Measurement and Verification (EA Credit 5)

Laboratory buildings require a higher level of monitoring than is provided by most Building Control Systems for fume hood controls, lighting sensors, humidity and temperature controls, and room air pressurization.

Simulation tools: CFD modeling scenarios

HVAC

It is essential practice to consider the whole HVAC system design and analyze assumptions using whole-building systems software. Reducing the overall building loads is a good place to start. Initial and operational costs can be trimmed by using smaller equipment; for example, using natural convection to exhaust air in the atrium to eliminate the need for a separate air handler.

Other ideas include:

Determining how to eliminate microbial growth in HVAC system is crucial. Drip pans or any area where water might sit for a period of time should be eliminated. The biggest problem is usually at the cooling coils because they are wet all the time. Ultra-violet lights can be used to kill the microbial growth, but the lights are expensive and difficult to maintain.

See WBDG High Performance HVAC.

Fume Hoods

Many factors must be considered when choosing the right laboratory fume hood, including how the hood will be used and how its placement affects its laboratory design. Worker safety and containment performance are of primary importance. Secondary considerations should be energy consumption and the cost to install, operate and maintain the hoods and supporting HVAC systems. The following must be carefully considered when making an informed decision regarding fume hood selection:

Affiliated Engineers, Inc. (AEI) of Madison, WI, had success in obtaining a variance for a project in California, where 100 FPM fume hood face velocity is the law. Officials were convinced to approve 80 FPM, setting a precedent in that state that we believe will be repeated at an increasing rate across the country as code officials and governing authorities become more informed on the issues surrounding this topic. The jury is still out on how far face velocity guidelines and design standards will be reduced. These new hoods seem to perform exceptionally well at 50 and 60 FPM—but the lower the face velocity, the more important it is that cross drafts and other dynamic challenges to hood performance be controlled.

The face velocity design criteria selected should provide a margin of error to take into account less than ideal conditions. The entire design team should work together to establish the proper baseline for each project.

High performance fume hoods are demonstrating better performance and containment at less air volume and face velocity. Subsequent energy efficiency and operating costs will save owners money, and they may be safer than conventional hoods.

Many things affect hood performance. Even the safest fume hoods can spill and expose workers if other factors are not carefully considered, including:

EH&S staff and qualified professionals should determine the best hood for each application and how the supporting HVAC system is designed, since the fume hood is an important component of a properly designed HVAC system. The potential safety, reliability, and energy-savings benefits can only be the result of the entire system and building working together well as a whole.

Combination Sashes

The combination sash, or dual sash, is a relatively new design that is being installed in many labs today. Exhaust air is reduced as much as 40% (compared to the traditional vertical or horizontal sash)—up to 500 cfm for a 6 ft hood—with a resulting reduction of energy requirements. The horizontal sliding panels can serve as face and body shields. The vertical sash can be raised during setup to provide full access to the hood interior at reduced face velocity. Though more cost-effective over the long run, the initial cost of the combination sash is slightly higher than that of either the vertical or horizontal sash. It must also be noted that some researchers do not feel comfortable working with the combination sash.

Lighting

Lighting is a key issue with many design options. For example:

See WBDG Energy-Efficient Lighting, Electric Lighting Controls, Windows and Glazing, Sun Control and Shading Devices.

Lighting considerations-lamp cost

4. Materials and Resources

The Materials and Resources section is where contractors and sub-contractors can have the most impact on a project. It focuses on buildings that are to be renovated, construction waste management and recycling, and other contractor-driven issues. Some of the contractor issues are determined by the percentage of local and regional materials to be purchased and how well a record of recycling is maintained throughout the construction phase. Proactively looking for affordable supplies locally and regionally is encouraged. The initial contract should specify that the contractors keep track of recyclables during construction.

Building Reuse (MR Credit 1)

Since it is difficult (and highly unlikely) to take material from an existing building and relocate it into a new wet lab facility, the most common way to earn LEED points in this category is on the renovation of an existing building. The majority of construction money for research is spent for modest renovation projects.

Construction Waste Management (MR Credit 2)

The general conditions of the specifications should specify that the contractor meet specific construction waste management goals, even though recycling on-site will add some cost to the project. When recycled, the material is comparable in price with other products that do not contain recycled materials. This change has evolved over the last five years, because of marketplace demand for more sustainable products, processes, and buildings.

Recycled Content (MR Credits 4.1 and 4.2), Rapidly Renewable Materials (MR Credit 6)

Manufacturers are becoming very competitive using recycled materials in their products. The following is a list of some products to consider:

Casework products are now being manufactured that are considered "green products." Examples include:

Certified Wood (MR Credit 7)

Following special wood from the forest to constructed wood casework will add some cost. This will vary depending on the casework manufacturer.

See WBDG Evaluating and Selecting Green Products

5. Indoor Environmental Quality

Many of the indoor environmental quality goals do not add cost or have a clear, quantifiable payback, but they do address quality of life issues. For example, the traditional economic argument for daylighting is that it is really about the costs associated with employee health and well-being.

EQ Credit 7.1-7.2: thermal comfort

Daylight spaces have been linked with improvements to health and well-being. Assume that this means a 1% increase in productivity 20 hours per year less sick time or non-productive work time) for a lab with a staff of 250. That translates into about $250,000/year in personnel cost savings—a substantial return on investment.

The contractor impacts the construction IAQ management plan during and after construction. Purchasing the most appropriate adhesives and sealants, paints and coatings, carpet, and composite wood is the responsibility of the contractor and sub-contractors. (EQ Credits 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4)

Two-thirds of the indoor environmental quality goals should be easily achieved, due to the change in market and development of better products.

Carbon Dioxide Monitoring (EQ Credit 1)

This is recommended and can be easily installed at a cost of a few thousand dollars.

Increase Ventilation Rates (EQ Credit 2)

Construction IAQ Management Plan During Construction (EQ Credit 3.1)

Construction IAQ Management Plan After Construction (EQ Credit Credit 3.1)

Most wet labs require 100% outside air and should be flushed out during the final commissioning. Non-lab spaces like offices, conference rooms, and atrium will require a two- week flush-out.

Low Emitting Materials (EQ Credits 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4)

Products that address these goals are easily attainable today.

Considerations for Interior Materials for Sustainability Issues or LEED Certification

Division 5 – Metals

Division 6 – Wood & Plastics

Division 7 – Thermal & Moisture Protection

Division 8 – Doors & Windows

Division 9 – Finishes

Plaster

Gypsum Wallboard

Acoustic Ceiling Panels

Wood Flooring

Resilient Flooring

Carpet

Wall Coverings

Paint

Division 10 – Specialties

Toilet Compartments

Fire Protection Specialties

Division 11 – Solid Waste Handling

Division 12 – Furniture

Window Treatment

Furniture

Green Housekeeping Program

A Green Housekeeping Program is also recommended. It is estimated that 5 million pounds of chemicals (many of which are toxic) are used to clean buildings in the U.S. each year. These chemical products and associated emissions and wastes offer a significant opportunity to impact the sustainability of building operations. The green housekeeping approach goes beyond traditional cleaning to a comprehensive methodology that improves health and safety, reduces environmental impacts, improves occupant productivity, and demonstrates concern for the health and well-being of cleaning personnel. The Green housekeeping strategy is based on the U.S. National Standard Guide on Stewardship for Cleaning Commercial and Institutional Buildings developed by the American Society for Testing and Materials.

Even if all the potentially toxic materials are removed during a building's construction, there is still a potential for indoor air quality contamination through traditional building cleaning methods and the use of potentially toxic chemicals. Some of the properties of cleaning agents that are recommended include:

Thermal Comfort (EQ Credit 7.1, 7.2)

A humidification system may be necessary to meet the technical requirements for specific equipment. Including a humidification system adds value for occupant comfort and, perhaps, employee productivity.

Daylight and Views, Daylight 75% of Spaces (EQ Credit 8.1, 8.2)

As large open labs and interior glazing become more common today, day-lighting and views goals are attainable for many projects. For laboratories, natural indirect light is recommended. Direct natural light could create problems for the research project. Labs that have little or no natural light because of equipment or specific research should not be a part of the calculations.

EQ credit 8.1 and 8.2: Silkha Neurogenetic Institute of USC, Ca.

The corridor arrangement can be the determining factor on whether a design solution will attain 75% or higher for daylighting and visibility. A single corridor in the middle of the building provides the best opportunity. Unless there is a large amount of interior glass, a double corridor arrangement with labs in the middle would be extremely difficult to achieve the 75% day-lighting and visibility goal. A three corridor scheme basically eliminates the possibility of reaching the goal.

EQ credit 8.1 and 8.2: daylight and views

See WBDG Evaluating and Selecting Green Products, Daylighting, Sun Control and Shading Devices, Windows and Glazing, Sustainable O&M Practices.

6. Innovation and Design Process

Most innovation goals can be achieved with no or very little additional cost. The Innovation and Design Process is usually addressed by a knowledgeable A/E team with a good LEED accredited professional.

Some design options to consider:

Innovation and design process - 5 points

LEED Accredited Professional (ID Credit 5)

Since many individuals have taken and passed the LEED exam, this point should be easy to achieve.

Relevant Codes and Standards

Federal Mandates

Additional Resources

WBDG

Building / Space Types

Office Building, Research Facilities, Animal Research Facility, Research Laboratory, Academic Laboratory, Government Laboratory, Private Sector Laboratory, Laboratory: Dry, Laboratory: Wet

Design Objectives

Accessible, Aesthetics, Cost-Effective, Functional / Operational, Productive, Secure / Safe, Sustainable

Project Management

Building Commissioning

Tools

LEED® Version 2.1 Credit / WBDG Resource Page Matrix, LEED®-DoD Antiterrorism Standards Tool

Publications

Federal Agencies and Programs

Organizations and Associations

WBDG Services Construction Criteria Base