- Balancing Security/Safety and Sustainability Objectives
- Facility Performance Evaluation (FPE)
- Flood Resistance of the Building Envelope
- Glazing Hazard Mitigation
- Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA)
- Seismic Design Principles
- Seismic Safety of the Building Envelope
- Threat/Vulnerability Assessments and Risk Analysis
- Wind Safety of the Building Envelope
- Windows and Glazing
Resist Natural Hazards
Last updated: 06-02-2010
Within This Page
Overview
Buildings in any geographic location are subject to a wide variety of natural phenomena such as windstorms, floods, earthquakes, and other hazards. While the occurrence of these incidents cannot be precisely predicted, their impacts are well understood and can be managed effectively through a comprehensive program of hazard mitigation planning.
Hazard Mitigation refers to measures that can reduce or eliminate the vulnerability of the built environment to hazards, whether natural or man-made. The fundamental goal of hazard mitigation is to minimize loss of life, property, and function due to disasters. Designing to resist any hazard(s) should always begin with a comprehensive risk assessment. This process includes identification of the hazards present in the location and an assessment of their potential impacts and effects on the built environment based on existing or anticipated vulnerabilities and potential losses. When hazard mitigation is implemented in a risk-informed manner, every dollar spent on mitigation actions results in an average of four dollars' worth of disaster losses being avoided.

Gulfport, Mississippi after Hurricane Katrina
It is common for different organizations to use varying nomenclature to refer to the components of risk assessment. For example, actual or potential adversary actions such as sabotage and terrorist attacks are referred to as "threats" by the law enforcement and intelligence communities, while natural phenomena such as hurricanes and floods are generally referred to as "hazards" by emergency managers; however, both are simply forces that have the potential to cause damage, casualties, and loss of function in the built environment. Regardless of who is conducting the risk assessment, the fundamental process of identifying what can happen at a given location, how it can affect the built environment, and what the potential losses could be, remains essentially the same from application to application.
Only after the overall risk is fully understood should mitigation measures be identified, prioritized, and implemented. Basic principles underlying this process include:
- The impacts of natural hazards and the costs of the disasters they cause will be reduced whether mitigation measures are implemented during new construction (preventively) or as retrofits (correctively). Proactively integrating mitigation measures into new construction is typically more economically feasible than retrofitting existing structures.
- Risk reduction techniques must address as many applicable hazards as possible. This approach, known as multi-hazard mitigation, is the most Cost-Effective approach, maximizes the protective effect of complementary mitigation measures and optimizes multi-hazard design techniques with other building technologies.
Recommendations
Design professionals agree that the most successful way to mitigate losses of life, property, and function is to design buildings that are disaster resistant. This approach should be incorporated into the project planning, design, and development at the earliest possible stage so that design and material decisions can be based on an integrated "whole building approach."
A variety of techniques are available to mitigate the effects of natural hazards on the built environment. Depending on the hazards identified, the location and construction type of a proposed building or facility, and the specific performance requirements for the building, the structure can be designed to resist hazard effects such as induced loads. Later in the building's life cycle, additional opportunities to further reduce the risk from natural hazards may exist when renovation projects and repairs of the existing structure is undertaken. When incorporating disaster reduction measures into building design, some or all of the issues outlined below should be considered in order to protect lives, properties, and operations from damages caused by natural hazards.
Earthquakes

FEMA News Photo: Earthquake Damage Paso Robles, California
Building design will be influenced by the level of seismic resistance desired. This can range from prevention of nonstructural damage in frequent minor ground shaking to prevention of structural damage and minimization of nonstructural damage in occasional moderate ground shaking, and even avoidance of collapse or serious damage in rare major ground shaking. These performance objectives can be accomplished through a variety of measures such as structural components like shear walls, braced frames, moment resisting frames, and diaphragms, base isolation, energy dissipating devices such as visco-elastic dampers, elastomeric dampers, and hysteretic-loop dampers, and bracing of nonstructural components.
Hurricanes, Typhoons, and Tornadoes

FEMA News Photo: Tornado Damage Mena, Arkansas
The key strategy to protecting a building from high winds caused by tornados, hurricanes, and gust fronts is to maintain the integrity of the building envelope, including roofs and windows, and to design the structure to withstand the expected lateral and uplift forces. For example, roof trusses and gables must be braced; hurricane straps must be used to strengthen the connection between the roof and walls; and doors and windows must be protected by covering and/or bracing. When planning renovation projects, designers should consider opportunities to upgrade the roof structure and covering and enhance the protection of fenestration. The Additional Resources section of this page includes several FEMA publications for designing community shelters, constructed to protect a large number of people from a natural hazard incident, and "residential safe rooms" for occupant refuge during windstorms.
Flooding

FEMA News Photo: Flooding in North Dakota
Flood mitigation is best achieved by hazard avoidance—that is, risk-informed site selection away from coastal, estuarine, and riverine floodplains. Should buildings be sited in flood-prone locations, they should be elevated above expected flood levels to reduce the chances of flooding and to limit the potential damage to the building and its contents when it is flooded. Flood mitigation techniques include elevating the building so that the lowest floor is above the flood level; dry flood-proofing, or making the building watertight to prevent water entry; wet flood-proofing, or making uninhabited or non-critical parts of the building resistant to water damage; relocation of the building; and the incorporation of levees and floodwalls into site design to keep water away from the building.
Rainfall and Wind-Driven Rain
One of the primary performance requirements for any building is that it should keep the interior space dry. All roofs and walls must therefore shed rainwater, and design requirements are the same everywhere in this respect. For example, roof drainage design must minimize the possibility of ponding water, and existing buildings with flat roofs must be inspected to determine compliance with this requirement. Recommendations for addressing rainfall and wind-driven rain can be found in the International Building Code (IBC) series.
Differential Settlement (Subsidence)
Ground subsidence can result from mining, sinkholes, underground fluid withdrawal, hydrocompaction, and organic soil drainage and oxidation. Subsidence mitigation can best be achieved through careful site selection, including geotechnical study of the site. In subsidence-prone areas, foundations must be appropriately constructed, basements and other below-ground projections must be minimized, and utility lines and connections must be stress-resistant. When retrofitting structures to be more subsidence-resistant, shear walls, geo-fabrics, and earth reinforcement techniques such as dynamic compaction can be used to increase resistance to subsidence damage and to stabilize collapsible soils.
Landslides and Mudslides

FEMA News Photo: Mudslide El Paso, Texas
Gravity-driven movement of earth material can result from water saturation, slope modifications, and earthquakes. Techniques for reducing landslide and mudslide risks to structures include selecting non-hillside or stable slope sites; constructing channels, drainage systems, retention structures, and deflection walls; planting groundcover; and soil reinforcement using geo-synthetic materials, and avoiding cut and fill building sites.
Wildfire

FEMA News Photo: Wildfire Rancho Bernardo, California
As residential developments expand into wild land areas, people and property are increasingly at risk from wildfire. Fire is a natural process in any wild land area and serves an important purpose; however, if ground cover is burned away, erosion, landslide, mudflow, and flood hazards can be exacerbated. A cleared safety zone of at least 30 feet (100 feet in pine forests) should be maintained between structures and combustible vegetation, and fire-resistant ground cover, shrubs, and trees should be used for landscaping (for example, hardwood trees are less flammable than pines, evergreens, eucalyptus or firs). Only fire-resistant or non-combustible materials should be used on roofs and exterior surfaces. Roofs and gutters should be regularly cleaned and chimneys should be equipped with spark arrestors. Vents, louvers, and other openings should be covered with wire mesh to prevent embers and flaming debris from entering. Overhangs, eaves, porches, and balconies can trap heat and burning embers and should also be avoided or minimized and protected with wire mesh. Windows allow radiated heat to pass through and ignite combustible materials inside, but dual- or triple-pane thermal glass, fire-resistant shutters or drapes, and noncombustible awnings can help reduce this risk.
Tsunami
A tsunami is a series of ocean waves generated by sudden displacements in the sea floor, landslides, or volcanic activity. In the deep ocean, the tsunami wave may only be a few inches high. The tsunami wave may come gently ashore or may increase in height to become a fast moving wall of turbulent water several meters high. Although a tsunami cannot be prevented, the impact of a tsunami can be mitigated through urban/land planning, community preparedness, timely warnings, and effective response.
Emerging Issues
Hazard Mitigation and Sustainability
Unsustainable development is one of the major factors in the rising costs of natural disasters. Given that hazard mitigation is at the core of disaster resistance, then, many design strategies and technologies serve double duty, by not only preventing or reducing disaster losses but serving the broader goal of long-term community sustainability. For example, erosion control measures designed to mitigate flood, mudslide, rainstorm, and other damage to a building's foundation may also improve the quality of runoff water entering streams and lakes. Similarly, land use regulations prohibiting development in flood-prone areas may also help preserve the natural and beneficial functions of floodplains.
Regardless of whether hazard mitigation is undertaken before or after a disaster—on the basis of a risk assessment in the former case, and as a result of unforeseen damages or a renewed understanding of vulnerability in the latter—it is always an inherently proactive endeavor. In situations where mitigation efforts are integrated into a holistic post-disaster recovery strategy, the principles of sustainability should guide every aspect of the recovery effort. By carefully balancing the full spectrum of interests relating to the built environment, psychosocial recovery, economic redevelopment, and preservation or restoration of the natural environment, an impacted community can ensure that the net result is enhanced long-term disaster resilience.
Climate change
Ongoing changes in climate patterns around the world are likely to begin altering the behavior of hydrometeorological phenomena within our lifetimes. The frequency and severity of floods, storms, droughts and other weather-related disasters is expected to increase, as is the risk from associated changes in the manifestation of other hazards such as wildfires. High-performance buildings should be designed to be part of the solution rather than part of the problem wherever possible, incorporating strategies to both mitigate climate change itself (e.g., greenhouse gas emission reduction) as well as to adapt to changing environmental conditions by leveraging traditional hazard mitigation strategies (e.g., elevating structures in increasingly floodprone areas, creating clear zones around buildings in areas with increasing wildfire risk, etc.).
Relevant Codes and Standards
Regulations, codes, standards, and best practices will guide the design of buildings to resist natural hazards. For new buildings, code requirements serve to define the minimum mitigation requirements, but compliance with regulations in building design is not sufficient to guarantee that a facility will perform adequately when impacted by the forces for which it was designed. Indeed, individual evaluation of the costs and benefits of specific hazard mitigation alternatives can lead to effective strategies that will exceed the minimum requirements. Additionally, special mitigation requirements may be imposed on projects in response to locale-specific hazards. When a change in use or occupancy occurs, the designer must determine whether this change triggers other mitigation requirements and must understand how to evaluate alternatives for meeting those requirements.
Finally, designers should augment the codes and standards to consider the importance of nonstructural elements, assets, and mission of the building, i.e., windows, hoods, parapets and balcony railings, and electrical and mechanical systems, because they may account for more than 70% of the value of a building.
- International Building Code (IBC)
- Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE 7-05—includes model requirements for dead, live, soil, flood, wind, snow, rain, ice, and earthquake loads, and their combinations, that are suitable for inclusion in building codes
- National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
Many states and municipalities have also adopted supplemental codes to meet local requirements for multi-hazard protection. Examples of such codes include:
- Miami-Dade County Code
- Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC)
- California Building Code, Title 24
General Multi-Hazard
- Public Law 106-390, Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000
Earthquake
- Executive Order 12699, Seismic Safety of Federal and Federally Assisted or Regulated New Building Construction (January 5, 1990)
- Executive Order 12941, Seismic Safety of Existing Federally Owned or Leased Buildings (December 1, 1994)
- Public Law 95-124, Earthquake Hazards Reduction Act (1977) United States Code Title 42, Chapter 86, Earthquake Hazards Reduction
- Public Law 101-614, National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program Reauthorization Act (1990)
- Public Law 103-374, Earthquake Hazards Reduction Act Of 1977, Authorization and Amendment (1994)
- Public Law 106-503, Earthquake Hazards Reduction Authorization Act (2000)
- UFC 3-310-01 Structural Load Data
- UFC 3-310-04 Seismic Design for Buildings
Hurricane, Typhoon, and Tornado
- Public Law 108-146 (PDF 26.5 KB, 2 pgs), Tornado Shelters Act (2003)
Flood
- Public Law 93-234, National Flood Insurance Act (1968)
Rainfall and Wind-Driven Rain
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- U.S. Department of Defense
- U.S. Department of Energy
- DOE-STD-1020-2002 Natural Phenomena Hazards Design and Evaluation Criteria for Department of Energy Facilities
- DOE-STD-1021-93 Natural Phenomena Hazards Performance Categorization Guidelines for Structures, Systems, and Components
- DOE-STD-1022-94 Natural Phenomena Hazards Characterization Criteria
- DOE-STD-1023-95 Natural Phenomena Hazards Assessment Criteria
Additional Resources
Organizations and Associations
General Multi-Hazard
- American Lifelines Alliance
- American Planning Association, Growing Smart project
- American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
- Applied Technology Council (ATC)—A nonprofit organization dedicated to developing and promoting state-of-the-art, user-friendly engineering resources and applications for use in mitigating the effects of natural and other hazards on the built environment
- Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Mitigation Division
- Institute for Business and Home Safety (IBHS)
- Multi-hazard Mitigation Council (MMC)—A program of the National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS)
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
- Natural Hazards Center, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado
- U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) (For Flood and Seismic Mapping)
Earthquake
- Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC)—Established by the National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) to develop and promote building earthquake risk mitigation regulatory provisions for the nation
- Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI)
- FEMA HAZUS (Hazards US) modeling
Hurricane, Typhoon, and Tornado
- National Roofing Contractors Association (NRCA)
- PGC International
- Wind Engineering Research Center, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX
- Wind Load Test Facility, Clemson University, Clemson, SC
Flood
- Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM)
- National Flood Insurance Program (FEMA)
- National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA)
Forest Fires
- Color Country Interagency Fire Management Area
- Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
- The Fire Safe Council
- Firewise
- National Interagency Fire Center
- National Wildfire Programs Database
Publications
General Multi-Hazard
- Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States. Mileti, Dennis S. Washington, DC: John Henry Press, 1999.
- Federal Emergency Management Agency
- Mitigation Resources for Success
- Planning for a Sustainable Future: The Link Between Hazard Mitigation and Livability (FEMA 364)
- FEMA Building Science Publications
- Planning for Post-Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction (FEMA 421)
- Rebuilding for a More Sustainable Future: An Operational Framework (FEMA 365)
- Understanding Your Risks: Identifying Hazards and Estimating Losses (FEMA 386-2)
- American Lifelines Alliance
- The Infrastructure Security Partnership (TISP)
Earthquake
- Interagency Committee on Seismic Safety in Construction (ICSSC)/National Institute of Science and Technology
- Standards of Seismic Safety for Existing Federally Owned or Leased Buildings (PDF 188 KB, 27 pgs) ICSSC RP 6 (NISTIR 6762) of 2002
- ICSSC Guidance on Implementing Executive Order 12941 on Seismic Safety of Existing Federally Owned or Leased Buildings (PDF 1.6 MB, 32 pgs) (1995, ICSSC RP 5)
- How-to Suggestions for Implementing Executive Order 12941 on Seismic Safety of Existing Federal Buildings, A Handbook (PDF 11.5 MB, 202 pgs) (1995, ICSSC TR-17)
- Federal Emergency Management Agency
- Reducing the Risks of Nonstructural Earthquake Damage, A Practical Guide (Fourth Edition 2009, FEMA 74)
- Seismic Considerations for Communities at Risk (2007, FEMA 83)
- Non-Technical Explanation of the 1994 NEHRP Recommended Provisions (2007, FEMA 99)
- Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for Potential Seismic Hazards: A Handbook (Second Edition 2002, FEMA 154)
- Typical Costs for Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings Volume 1: Summary (Second Edition 1994, FEMA 156)
- Typical Costs for Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings Volume 2: Supporting Documentation (Second Edition 1995, FEMA 157)
- NEHRP Handbook of Techniques for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings (1992, FEMA 172)
- Establishing Programs and Priorities for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings: Supporting Report (FEMA 173) and Handbook (FEMA 174)
- Financial Incentives for Seismic Rehabilitation of Hazardous Buildings—An Agenda for Action Volume 1: Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations (FEMA 198); Volume 2: State and Local Case Studies and Recommendations (FEMA 199); and Volume 3: Applications Workshops Report (FEMA 216)
- Home Builders Guide to Seismic Resistant Construction (FEMA 232)
- Development of Guidelines for Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings—Phase 1: Issues identification and Resolution (FEMA 237)
- Seismic Rehabilitation of Federal Buildings: A Benefit/Cost Model Volume 1: A User's Manual (FEMA 255) and Volume 2: Supporting Documentation (FEMA 256)
- NEHRP Guidelines for Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings—Commentary (1997, FEMA 274)
- Evaluation of Earthquake Damaged Concrete and Masonry Buildings (FEMA 306 / 307 / 308)
- NEHRP Handbook for the Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings (1998, FEMA 310)
- Promoting the Adoption and Enforcement of Seismic Building Codes (1998, FEMA 313)
- Case Studies: An Assessment of the NEHRP Guidelines for Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (1999, FEMA 343)
- An Action Plan for Performance Based Seismic Design (2000, FEMA 349)
- Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings (2000, FEMA 350)
- Recommended Seismic Evaluation and Upgrade Criteria for Existing Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings (2000, FEMA 351)
- Recommended Post-Earthquake Evaluation and Repair Criteria for Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings (2000, FEMA 352)
- Recommended Specifications and Quality Assurance Guidelines for Steel Moment-Frame Construction for Seismic Applications (2000, FEMA 353)
- A Policy Guide to Steel Moment-Frame Construction (FEMA 354)
- Pre-standard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (FEMA 356)
- NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings, 2000 Edition, 2 volumes and maps (FEMA 368 and 369)
- Incremental Seismic Rehabilitation of School Buildings (K-12) (2003, FEMA 395)
- Designing for Earthquakes: A Manual for Architects (Dec. 2006, FEMA 454)
- U.S. Department of Defense
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Hurricane, Typhoon, and Tornado
- Federal Emergency Management Agency
- Coastal Construction Manual (2000, FEMA 55)
- Homeowner's Guide to Retrofitting (FEMA 312)
- Taking Shelter From the Storm: Building a Safe Room For Your Home or Small Business (2008, FEMA 320)
- Design and Construction Guidance for Community Safe Rooms (Second Edition FEMA 361)
- FEMA Building Performance Assessment Team (BPAT) Reports for various hurricanes
- U.S. Department of Defense
Flood
- Federal Emergency Management Agency
- Design Guidelines for Flood Damage Reduction (FEMA 15)
- Elevated Residential Structures (FEMA 54)
- Protecting Manufactured Homes from Floods and Other Hazards (FEMA 85)
- Floodproofing Non-Residential Structures (FEMA 102)
- Reducing Losses in High Risk Flood Hazard Areas: A Guidebook for Local Officials (FEMA 116)
- Repairing Your Flooded Home (FEMA 234)
- Engineering Principals and Practices for Retrofitting Floodprone Residential Structures (FEMA 259)
- Above the Flood: Elevating Your Floodprone House (FEMA 347)
- Protecting Building Utilities From Flood Damage (FEMA 348)
- Design Guide for Improving Critical Facility Safety from Flooding and High Winds: Providing Protection to People and Buildings (Jan. 2007, FEMA 543)
- Technical Bulletin series (FEMA TB 1-10)
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
- Engineering and Design—Water Control Management (1982, ER 1110-2-240)
- Life-Cycle Design and Performance of Structures for Local Flood Protection (ETL 1110-2-361)
- U.S. Department of Defense
Landslide, Mudslide
- Federal Emergency Management Agency
Progressive Collapse
- UFC 4-023-03 Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse
- FEMA Technical Library—Offers many PDF format documents on Disaster Preparation and Prevention
NOTE: To order FEMA publications that are not available online, request by title or document number from the FEMA Publications Warehouse at (800) 480-2520