Balancing Security/Safety and Sustainability Objectives

by Richard Paradis and Bambi Tran
Steven Winter Associates, Inc.

Last updated: 05-05-2008

Introduction

Since the early 1990s, sustainability has become an increasing priority for facilities projects. However, the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 have caused building owners and occupants to pay more attention to facility security and safety issues. On the surface, it may appear that secure/safe design has little relationship to sustainable design. Yet, security and safety measures, such as those for anti-terrorism and force protection (ATFP), must be considered within a total project context, including impacts on occupants and the environment, regardless of the level of protection deemed appropriate.

This Resource Page aims to provide designers with an understanding of the interaction between security/safety and sustainability objectives by emphasizing the 'whole building' or integrated design process, identifying areas of synergy and potential conflicts between sustainable and security/safety approaches, and highlighting sustainability opportunities within certain security/safety strategies. With this information in hand, the project team can define and understand the interrelationships between the project's needs and achieve balanced design solutions that will minimize environmental impacts as well as ensure the health, safety, security, and comfort of building occupants.

Drawing of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse-Denver, CODrawing of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse-Denver, CO

Figs. 1 and 2: The new Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse in Denver, Colorade serves as a model for designs that balances openness, security, and sustainability. The building showcases innovative sustainable strategies, such as photovoltaic cells and daylighting using light shelves, while also being one of the first U.S. courthouses to meet the new "GSA Security Design Criteria" standards.

Description

A. Integrated Design Process

It is important to understand that secure/safe, sustainable facilities don't just happen. The level of security/safety and sustainability incorporated in a facility varies greatly from project to project. But achieving quality, high performance facilities has a lot to do with an integrated process that identifies and embraces the goals of the project—including security/safety, sustainability, productivity, accessibility, functionality, aesthetics, historic preservation, and cost-effectiveness—early on. Working as a team from the outset, planners, designers, engineers, and all project stakeholders are able to develop creative solutions to design challenges that yield multiple benefits. For example, a design strategy that at once reduces material use during construction saves energy during facility operation, and results in a more secure, healthier working environment. Also, rather than optimizing individual systems, the project team must understand that the most effective results can be obtained by designing various building systems and components as interdependent parts of the entire structure. This conceptual framework starts at the planning phase and is carried out through design and construction to building activation and operation. See also 'Whole Building' Approach and Aesthetics—Engage the Integrated Design Process.

B. Safe and Sustainable Trade-offs and Synergies

Given budgetary and other constraints, integrating secure/safe and sustainable design objectives oftentimes requires compromise and tradeoffs. For example, increasing glazing area to provide daylighting can be incompatible with the desire to decrease glazing to minimize glass hazard. Similarly, designating surface parking away from a building to provide appropriate stand-off distance can limit the extent to which a project can meet its site disturbance reduction goals. These inherent conflicts challenge the project team to find creative solutions for the issues at hand.

Following are key areas of interaction between security/safety and sustainability goals and measures. The project team is advised to evaluate the benefits and disadvantages of pursuing these strategies, weighing them against the project's identified requirements and desired outcome in order to achieve a balanced design. Engaging integrated design will greatly facilitate this process.

Site

Trade-Offs

Security and sustainable site planning strategies can significantly affect each other. For example, a facility's risk can be increased and security can be compromised by siting it in an urban area to protect greenfields and preserve habitat and natural resources; locating carpool/vanpool parking and bike racks nearby to promote alternative transportation; constructing under-building parking to minimize habitat disturbance; and installing covered walkways and landscaping to reduce heat islands and control erosion. On the other hand, security measures such as building setbacks, or standoff distances, to create protective building perimeters and to restrict access; installing barriers (e.g., bollards, planters, and fountains) to withstand assaults by moving vehicles; and locating parking areas in remote areas and/or eliminating under-building parking areas to minimize blast effects from potential vehicle bombs, usually result in increased development of open space, habitat disturbance, and possibly erosion.

Synergies
Blocking sightlines: Sightlines are blocked by an obstruction screen and trees.

Fig. 3: Blocking sightlines

Water

Trade-Offs
Synergies

Energy

Photo of the Trombe wall at NREL's Solar Energy Research Facility-Golden, CO

Fig. 4: Trombe wall at NREL's Solar Energy Research Facility—Golden, CO

Trade-Offs

Because the opportunity to reduce load and employ energy efficiency measures is dependent on the chosen project site and site design, a site planned for security may not be optimal for energy conservation. The installation of onsite power generation and fuel supply for back-up power and/or increased power reliability may increase development of open space as well as habitat disturbance. Also, additional equipment and systems needed to mitigate natural hazards, protect against fires, and defend against terrorist attacks will increase the building's energy load and may affect its energy performance.

Synergies

Materials

Trade-Offs

Buildings should be safe places to live and work. However, only few buildings need to be Level 5 (maximum) secure. To prevent unneeded security upgrades, hence use of more resources and materials, a comprehensive threat assessment, vulnerability assessment, and risk analysis should be conducted to identify the appropriate level of security for the building.

Synergies

There are some security and safety products made of materials with recycled content or other environmentally preferable characteristics. Examples include concrete planters made with slag (a by-product of steel production) and recycled content metal fencing (both could be used for perimeter access control).

Indoor Environmental Quality

Trade-Offs
Figure 5 showing the AHU most vulnerable when the opening for air intake is directly beside it, better with the opening above the AHU, and best with the opening even higher above the AHU.

Fig. 5: Protecting outdoor air intakes

Synergies

C. Sustainable Design Considerations and Opportunities

The table below identifies sustainable design considerations and opportunities when employing various safe design strategies.

Safety and Security Strategies Sustainable Design Considerations/Opportunities
Access Control*
Secure site perimeter Integrate with sustainable landscaping scheme. See WBDG Sustainable—Optimize Site Potential and Achieving Sustainable Site Design through Low Impact Development Practices
Use barriers to prevent passage of vehicles Use natural and/or environmentally friendly barriers (e.g., trees, retention ponds, recycled-content planters, etc.). See WBDG Achieving Sustainable Site Design through Low Impact Development Practices and Low Impact Development Technologies
Minimize public entrances into the building Integrate with daylighting scheme
Secure vulnerable openings (e.g. doors, first floor windows) Integrate with daylighting scheme
Install electronic access systems (e.g., parking, elevators) Use energy-efficient systems. Consider renewable and/or distributed energy resources. See WBDG Building Integrated Photovoltaics, Distributed Energy Resources, Fuel Cell Technology, Microturbines
Secure critical functions (e.g., IT, mechanical systems) Consider dedicated ventilation and/or exhaust systems
Surveillance*
Place windows and doors to allow for good visibility Integrate with daylighting scheme
Avoid spaces that permit concealment Integrate with daylighting scheme
Define public versus private interior zones  
Avoid blocking lines of sight with fencing and landscaping Integrate with landscaping and daylighting schemes.
Locate public areas (e.g., restrooms) where they can be easily observed  
Design lighting to reinforce natural surveillance Integrate with building automation and control systems. Use energy-efficient systems. Consider renewable and/or distributed energy sources, such as solar power night lighting. See WBDG Building Integrated Photovoltaics, Distributed Energy Resources, Fuel Cell Technology, Microturbines
Install intrusion devices and video systems Integrate with building automation and control systems. Use energy-efficient lighting and controls. Consider renewable and/or distributed energy sources
Use screen and tracking systems Integrate with building automation and control systems. Use energy-efficient lighting. Consider renewable and/or distributed energy sources
Blast Protection*
Design structural systems to prevent or delay building collapse Integrate with passive solar design (e.g., Trombe walls). Use sustainable materials (e.g., fly-ash concrete, slag concrete, steel columns, etc.)
Use building configurations to better resist blast shock waves Integrate with passive solar design and daylighting scheme
Maximize distances between parking and buildings Integrate with alternative transportation plans
Size and locate windows with detonation points in mind Integrate with daylighting scheme
Use blast or ballistic resistant glazing Use blast or ballistic resistant and energy-efficient window films
Increase strength of exterior cladding and nonstructural elements Use sustainable materials. Consider thermal benefits of strengthened cladding options
Avoid exterior ornamentation that can break away Integrate with sun control and shading devices
Chemical, Biological, Radiological Protection* Consider dedicated ventilation and/or exhaust systems
Elevate fresh air intakes Integrate with energy-efficient HVAC system
Prevent unauthorized access to fresh-air intakes  
Reduce need for utilities. Consider renewable and/or distributed energy resources
Apply external air filtration and overpressurization techniques Integrate with building automation and control systems
Use internal air filtration technologies Integrate with building automation and control systems
Secure vulnerable areas (e.g., mail rooms, loading docks, mechanical rooms, storage) Consider dedicated ventilation and/or exhaust systems
Establish mail-handling protocols and procedures  
Establish emergency plans for biochemical attacks  
Energy Security*
Create redundant systems Reduce need for energy. Use energy-efficient systems. Consider renewable and/or distributed energy resources
Occupant Safety and Health**
Provide designs that eliminate or reduce hazards in the work place to prevent mishaps Integrate safety mechanisms with sustainable features. Use integrated building automation and control systems
Prevent occupational injuries and illnesses Consider integrated natural and mechanical ventilation systems. Use integrated building automation and control systems
Prevent falls from heights Use sustainable materials for guardrails and barriers. Operable windows should have safety measures to prevent falls
Prevent slips, trips, and falls Integrate daylighting into illumination scheme
Ensure electrical safety  
Eliminate exposure to hazardous materials (e.g., volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and formaldehyde, lead, and asbestos in older buildings) Use sustainable materials (e.g., no-VOC paint, formaldehyde-free finish panels, etc.). Use dedicated ventilation and/or exhaust systems in copy rooms, labs, loading docks, and mailrooms.
Provide good indoor air quality (IAQ) and adequate ventilation Use daylighting. Consider integrated natural and mechanical ventilation systems. Use integrated building automation and control systems
Provide ergonomic work places to prevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSD) Use sustainable materials
Perform proper building operations and maintenance Implement total building commissioning. Use integrated building automation and control systems
Provide for proper receiving, storing, and handling of consumable materials Implement total building commissioning

* Source: Building Security Through Design: A Primer for Architects, Design Professionals, and their Clients by The American Institute of Architects. Washington, DC: AIA, 2001, p. 15.
** Source: WBDG Safe—Ensure Occupant Safety & Health

Application

Representative Examples

California's Office of Emergency Services Headquarters, Sacramento, California: Located on a 12-acre site, the complex is the anchor project for the adaptive reuse of the former Mather Air Force Base. It exemplifies the newest generation of open yet secure, safe, and sustainable buildings. Strategies and features include: use of landform to control vehicular access; open, daylit spaces for comfortable, productive work environments; and back-up fuel supply for energy security.

Pentagon Renovation, Arlington, Virginia: The energy management control system installed to efficiently manage the heating, cooling, and lighting systems throughout the Pentagon allowed officials to manipulate all the building systems in the first minutes after the 9/11 terrorist attack. This minimized the areas of the building that had to be entered to operate equipment, reducing risks to employees. Also, the Pentagon's new windows, installed for security and energy efficiency benefits, helped to contain damage from the attack. See also Pentagon Renovation Program

Photo of California's Office of Emergency Services Headquarters-Sacramento, CAPhoto of Pentagon renovations.

Left: Fig. 6 - California's Office of Emergency Services Headquarters—Sacramento, California. Break out rooms surround the command and logistics room, shielding it from exposure to the outside, although clerestories allow a generous amount of daylight to enter the space.
(Courtesy of enr.com and archrecord.com)
And Right: Fig. 7 - Pentagon renovations

Williams Communications' Headquarters, Tulsa, Oklahoma: At the core of the Williams Communications' headquarters building is a 47,000 sf highly secure network operations center that provides a spacious, daylit, dynamic work environment for its occupants. More

Defense Intelligence Analysis Center (DIAC), Bolling Air Force Base, Washington, DC: The approximately $100 million project is a first-class, six story 450,000 sf office building designed to consolidate uniquely skilled intelligence personnel currently working in lease spaces throughout the region. Connected to an existing building via a corridor, the project successfully integrates security and sustainability features within the design, creating an energy-efficient, comfortable, yet very secure facility. For example, the design of the facility takes advantage of the earth berm behind so it would be able to withstand impact by a truck traveling at 40 MPH. More

Oklahoma City Federal Building, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma: The 181,000 sf facility replaces the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Office Building, which was destroyed by a bomb in 1995. As the owner, the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) wanted the building to be transparent, open, and accessible to public as well as secure and sustainable. One of the primary strategy was using landscaping, including light fixtures and other streetscape items, to provide the appropriate setback distance and to serve as security barriers, For more information, see "Secure and Sustainable" by Gordon Wright. Building Design and Construction. August 2004.

Relevant Codes and Standards

Federal Mandates

Standards and Guidelines

Air Force

Army

Department of Defense

Department of Health and Human Services

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)

General Services Administration:

Navy

Additional Resources

WBDG

Building / Space Types

Applicable to all building types and space types

Design Objectives

Accessible, Aesthetics, Cost-Effective, Functional / Operational, Historic Preservation, Productive, Secure / Safe, Sustainable

Products and Systems

Atria Systems, Federal Green Construction Guide for Specifiers—26 50 00 (16500) Lighting

Project Management

Project Delivery & Controls, Building Commissioning

Tools

Construction Waste Management Tool, LEED® Version 2.1 Credit / WBDG Resource Page Matrix, LEED®-DoD Antiterrorism Standards Tool

Executive Order 13423 Technical Guidance for Implementing the Guiding Principles for Federal Leadership in High Performance and Sustainable Buildings—Daylighting

Federal Agencies

Department of Defense

Others

Publications

Organizations

Related Resource Pages
WBDG Services Construction Criteria Base