Structural Engineering

by Jon A. Schmidt, P.E., SECB
Burns & McDonnell for the National Council of Structural Engineers Associations (NCSEA)

Last updated: 04-24-2008

Introduction

Every part of a building is subject to the effects of outside forces—gravity, wind, earthquakes, and temperature changes, to name a few. Throughout history, people have constructed buildings that have withstood these forces over a long period of time, primarily using rules of thumb derived from their own experiences and those of their predecessors. In recent centuries, the scientific and industrial revolutions introduced analytical approaches that allowed designers to go beyond empirical limitations and predict the behavior of building systems and components that existed only in their imaginations. This gave rise to the formalization and specialization of the modern engineering profession, which in turn led to more accurate and cost-effective designs. Today the individual responsible for ensuring that buildings will remain standing while carrying out their intended functions is the structural engineer.

Description

Structural steel framing during erection

Structural steel framing during erection
(Courtesy of Burns & McDonnell)

The Council of American Structural Engineers (CASE) defines a structural engineer as: "An engineer with specialized knowledge, training, and experience in the sciences and mathematics relating to analyzing and designing force-resisting systems for buildings and other structures." A structural engineer usually has one of two roles on a building project, as identified by CASE:

Every project should have a single designated SER who establishes the structural design criteria and concepts for the project, but may delegate the detailed design of certain portions to SSEs by communicating this information and other requirements on the construction documents (drawings and specifications). In such cases, the SSEs subsequently prepare calculations and construction documents of their own for the delegated work and submit them to the SER, who verifies that they comply with the specified requirements and are consistent with the project as a whole. Without the SER, it is difficult to ensure adequate coordination of design work that is performed by multiple SSEs. This problem often arises in design-build situations when various subcontractors supply their own design services, but there is no SER to review the documents that they produce and harmonize them with each other.

Organization diagram of a typical relationship between the SER and SSEs

Typical relationship between the SER and SSEs

It is important that the SER be involved in the project as early as possible, before concepts for architectural, mechanical, and electrical systems have been finalized. The SER can provide valuable input into these decisions, addressing such factors as:

Partial framing plan showing repetitive bay and member sizes and locations for shear walls and framed openings

Partial framing plan showing repetitive bay and member sizes and locations for shear walls and framed openings
(Courtesy of Burns & McDonnell)

Early SER involvement is especially critical for fast-track and design-build projects, when it is often necessary to issue the structural construction documents well in advance of those prepared by other disciplines. Even in conventional design-bid-build situations, the structural system is the first to be constructed, providing the underlying framework for the rest. Close coordination among all members of the design team is essential throughout the design process.

The structural engineer is concerned with providing not only adequate strength for the building, but also serviceability. Beams that deflect excessively under their design loads can cause problems with floor and ceiling finishes, especially those that include brittle materials. A light and inexpensive framing system may exhibit uncomfortable vibrations when subjected to human foot traffic. If high winds cause considerable lateral movement, unacceptable cracks may develop in exterior walls and interior partitions.

The SER should continue to be involved in a building project until construction is complete. No set of documents is perfect; review of submittals and firsthand observations at the site may reveal conflicts between disciplines or misinterpretations by the contractor at a point in time when it is still possible to correct them with minimal cost and schedule impacts.

Fabrication shop drawing for a structural steel beam

Fabrication shop drawing for a structural steel beam
(Courtesy of Burns & McDonnell)

Emerging Issues

Structural engineers have a uniquely significant responsibility for protecting the public relative to the other design disciplines. Architectural, mechanical, and electrical system failures usually result in unattractiveness, poor functionality, discomfort and/or inconvenience. A structural system failure almost always has more serious consequences, even in the best cases, there are often substantial costs associated with correcting what is or could become a life-threatening situation. As a result, professional liability insurance rates for structural engineers have been increasing, leading to the creation of the Risk Management Program (RMP). In addition, efforts are underway to establish board certification at the national level and expand separate licensure at the state level to "raise the bar" of qualifications to practice structural engineering.

Map of the United States showing separate structural engineering licensure

Separate structural engineering licensure in the United States

The events of September 11, 2001 have brought terrorism to the forefront as a design consideration, especially for attractive targets such as "icon" buildings, government facilities, and military installations. Structural engineers who work on these projects, or those nearby that could suffer collateral damage in an attack, must now be familiar with the principles of blast effects analysis and design, as well as resistance to progressive collapse. These phenomena are highly sensitive to nonstructural factors such as standoff distance within the site, facade configurations and connections, and the presence of reentrant corners or transfer girders at the building perimeter. Retrofit of existing buildings to address these considerations is especially difficult and potentially costly.

Relevant Codes and Standards

Major Resources

WBDG

Design Objectives

Aesthetics—Select Appropriate Design Professionals, Historic—Update Building Systems Appropriately, Historic—Accommodate Life Safety and Security Needs, Secure / Safe—Resist Natural Hazards, Secure / Safe—Provide Security for Building Occupants and Assets

Professional Associations

Industry Organizations

Publications

WBDG Services Construction Criteria Base