Apply the Preservation Process Successfully
Last updated: 04-30-2008
Overview
Work on historic buildings, landscapes, archaeological sites, or other cultural resources, requires knowledge of a unique process of compliance and review. This process differs from work on existing buildings or on new construction and should be considered in concert with other project goals requiring close collaboration between preservationists and design disciplines. To ensure a balanced, economically viable, and preservation-sensitive project, the outline below should be followed.
A. Initial Project Planning Stage
Determining What Makes a Building Historic and Who Makes this Determination
In the United States, a property—either public or private—is considered historic if it meets a set of criteria established by the National Register of Historic Places, a division of the National Park Service that lists cultural resources worthy of preservation. The nomination process is initiated by a property owner and/or interested citizen in collaboration with the following entities (these entities also determine if a property is eligible for listing): State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPOs) for properties in their state, Federal Preservation Officers (FPO) for properties under federal ownership or control, and Tribal Historic Preservation Officers (THPO) for properties on tribal lands or with tribal interests. These organizations process the nominations and then forward them to the National Register of Historic Places in Washington, DC for final approval.
Eligibility for listing in the National Register is based on a set of criteria, which are used by those involved in the decision making process on local, state and federal levels. There are also local and state registers who evaluate their resources in a similar manner.
A general threshold for eligibility in the National Register, or state or local registers, is that the property be at least 50 years old, although there are exceptions to this rule. The four principal eligibility criteria are:
- Resources that are associated with the events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of historic; or
- Resources that are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or
- Resources that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or
- Resources that have yield or may be likely to yield information important in prehistoric or history.

Monticello, Charlottesville, VA, Thomas Jefferson, 1768 to 1782.
Credit: Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division, FSA-OWI Collection, John Collier Photographer. Reproduction number, e.g., LC-USF35-1326
Eligible properties that meet these criteria and successfully complete the formal nomination process are then "listed" in national, state, and/or local registers. Buildings are either located within the boundaries of a designated "historic district", or are "individually listed" for their architectural and/or historical merit. A listed building may also become eligible for tax credits and other financial incentives.
A completed register nomination form may be a valuable source of information on a building's (or other resource's) history. Nominations are generally available through State Historic Preservation Offices, or through the National Register of Historic Places.
Conduct Investigation and Research
Completing a state and/or national historic register nomination requires general knowledge of the resource type being considered (building, landscape, archaeological site), which necessitates investigation and historical research requiring qualified preservation professionals. Procuring qualified preservation professionals can make the process more efficient. (Refer to section on Form a Qualified and Experienced Project Team in Section B below.) There may also be regulations, guidelines, and applicable codes that must be followed. Preparing a nomination should be done in consultation with the consulting agencies (State Historic Preservation Office, the Federal Preservation Office, and the Tribal Historic Preservation Office) to make certain all requirements are met. Nominations for federal properties in certain historic districts must also be reviewed by the local historic preservation commission.
Understand the History of a Property
For the long-term preservation of a historic property, it is very important to understand its history before any construction begins. Consider the following:
- When was it built?
- With what materials and methods was it built?
- Who was the architect or designer?
- What are its architectural characteristics or features?
- Are these features unique in some way?
- What is their condition and will they be lost if not repaired in a timely manner?
- Are original drawings or other planning documents for a building still available?
- Has the building changed over time? If so, how?

Gamble House, Pasadena, CA, Greene and Greene, 1909.
(Courtesy of National Park Service)
Archival research to verify the original appearance of the building and site is helpful in establishing preservation priorities and in preparing treatment alternatives.
An excellent planning tool for successfully completing a project for any historic resource is to develop a Preservation Management Plan. This document records a resource's history, why it is significant, what are the most important features to preserve if work is completed. The plan delineates which areas require special protection or which areas first merit rehabilitation. The preservation management plan guides future maintenance, repairs, and alterations. Some also provide detailed guidance for rehabilitation or adaptive use.
The following are sources to aid in archival research concerning the property:
National Sources
- American Association of State & Local History
- American Historical Association
- Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS)—for architectural drawings
- Historic Americal Engineering Record (HAER)—for architectural drawings
- Library of Congress
- National Archives
- National Register of Historic Places—National Register Research
State Sources
- State Historic Preservation Offices
- State Nonprofit Preservation Alliances
- State archives, newspapers, historical societies, libraries, and genealogical societies
Local Sources
- Local preservation commissions, archives, newspapers, historical societies, libraries
Determine the Regulation, Guidelines, and Standards That Affect the Proposed Work
When work is proposed for a historic property, compliance involving a variety of public agencies may be required. Compliance with federal preservation laws is mandatory if the property is using federal funds, leases, grants, permits, or licenses (even if the historic resource is privately owned), is on federal land, or is under the jurisdiction of the federal government. To save time and money, determine ahead of time who must review the preservation project and learn what is required for approval (at all governmental levels).
Section 106 and Section 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act
Section 106, 36 CFR Part 800, Protection of Historic Properties: Section 106 regulations require that the head of any federal agency "prior to the approval of the expenditure of any federal funds on the [construction] undertaking take into account the effect of the undertaking on any [historic] district, site, building, structure, or object". Or, more simply, if federal funds are used to do work on an individual property, then studies must be conducted to determine the potential effect of the work on the property. If any historic or cultural resource (building, land, structure, object, or feature) will be adversely affected by the work, then mitigation and/or remedial plans must be made, as well as a plan to suitably document any resource to be lost. The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation establishes policy on this process.
Section 110: Section 110 regulations require that each federal agency establish and maintain a "preservation program for the identification, evaluation, and nomination to the National Register of Historic Places, and protection of historic properties" for all properties owned by or under the jurisdiction of the agency, thus providing responsible management of current and future historic properties under their care.
For more information on compliance with Section 106 and Section 110, refer to the following:
- The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
- Federal Preservation Officers (FPO)—For projects affiliated with an agency of the federal government
- State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPO)
- Tribal Historic Preservation Officers (THPO)—For projects affiliated with a property located on or owned by a Sovereign Tribe recognized by the United States federal government
Legal Agreements
Sometimes there are historic easements, covenants, mechanisms of title transfer, or other legal agreements placed on historic properties that can restrict work undertaken.
For more information on easements, refer to the following:
- The Conservation Easement Handbook: Managing Land Conservation and Historic Preservation Easement Programs by Janet Diehl and Thomas S. Barrett. Land Trust Alliance.
- Façade Easements
- Preservation Easements—An Important Legal Tool for the Preservation of Historic Places
- What is a Historic Preservation Easement?
There are also binding commitments that federal agencies make with specific regulators that must be taken into consideration. These arrangements are established to protect significant historic, archeological, or cultural resources, and to ensure that the property's intrinsic values will be preserved for future generations through subsequent ownership.
Local Compliance
For information on compliance to local regulations, refer to the following:
- Certified Local Governments
- Historic Preservation Review Boards (contact local historic or preservation society, permitting board, or county clerk)
- National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA)
Codes Compliance—Building Codes and Historic Buildings
Until recently, building codes were generally written exclusively for new construction with few provisions made for historic buildings and their unique requirements. New codes are now being developed for older structures on local, state, and national levels. These include those listed in the Codes & Standards.
Additionally, significant older buildings often qualify for zone or code variances if provisions are not explicitly made for historic buildings in the state or local code. Federal Agencies must adhere to other mandates, such as those listed in the WBDG Mandates/Reference section. Federal employees embarking upon a project involving a historic building in addition to checking with the agency's Federal Preservation Officer (FPO), should check with their environmental compliance office, preservation office, and/or facilities division for immediate requirements that must be adhered to.
Identify the Character-Defining Features of the Historic Property

U.S. Capitol
Courtesy of Architect of the Capitol
The terms "character-defining" or "architectural character" refer to all those distinctive elements and physical features that comprise the appearance of every historic building. Character-defining aspects of a historic building include its massing, materials, features, craftsmanship, decorative details, interior spaces and features, as well its site and environment.
Consider the following in identifying the character defining features of the historic property:
- Site
- Setting, landscape features, district, or neighborhood
- Plan
- Spatial definition and volume
- Envelope
- Roof profile
- Window and door pattern
- Elements and assemblies
- Envelope materials
- Finishes
- Interior materials
- Color and texture
- Decoration (ornamentation and artwork)
- Fixtures and furnishings
Following are recommended sources to aid in the investigation and to help identify a building's most salient features:
- National Park Service: Preservation Brief 17—Architectural Character: Identifying the Visual Aspects of Historic Buildings as an Aid to Preserving Their Character
- National Park Service: The Walk Through—Identifying the Visual Character of Historic Buildings
- National Park Service: The Good Guides—A group of websites developed by the National Park Service to help people new to the preservation field understand how to care for historic buildings.
- National Park Service: The Illustrated Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings—the online version of the book. The print version is available through the Government Printing Office.
- National Park Service: A Checklist for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings
Fit the Program to the Historic Building

This former rail station depot was converted to a hotel with reception areas. This program fit the extant building well.
Courtesy of National Park Service.
The goal of preservation is to protect the historic integrity of an individual building and its surroundings. Once the important features of a property are identified, their protection is a priority. The design process should respect and respond to the historic features.
Consider the following:
- Will the building's proposed new use compromise its integrity?
- Can the design include provisions for protecting the property from the wear and tear associated with active use?
- What should tenant do to ensure long-term protection of the resource?
- Does it involve removing too much of the original architectural materials, changing the plan, or adding an addition that will adversely affect the historic construction?
- Are there alternative approaches that will save more historic fabric?
- Is it feasible to adapt this property to meet the programmatic needs?
- Is it possible to satisfy federal, state, and local regulations and compliance that deal with historic preservation?


Instead of demolishing the former train shed, it was converted into an indoor ice arena. This program fit the extant building well.
Courtesy of National Park Service; Photo of indoor ice arena: Audrey Tepper
For more information, click here.
B. Planning Stage
Form a Qualified and Experienced Project Team
A historic property's architectural integrity and successful long-term preservation rest on decisions made throughout the entire design and construction process. Therefore, assembling an experienced, competent project team is extremely important. The selected preservation professionals should have experience working on similar historic preservation projects (e.g., the same building type or property), and understanding their unique requirements.
Historic building surveys, planning documents, and technical studies concerning repair and alteration of historic material and spaces should be prepared only by firms and individuals meeting, at a minimum, Department of Interior qualification standards for the applicable preservation professions. This should also be done in accordance with the Secretary's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. These individuals include but are not limited to architectural conservators, architectural historians, preservation architects, preservation engineers, and other allied preservation professionals.
Some agencies have developed criteria and procedures for evaluating the competency of preservation professionals and construction contractors.
There are many sources for finding good expertise in historic preservation, including:
- Federal Preservation Officer (FPO)—For Federal Agencies. Some agencies also have preservation professionals on staff or on contract.
- GSA Preservation Professionals
- Construction Contractors
- State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO)—SHPOs often have lists of individuals with this type of experience.
- How to Find Preservation Professionals
Develop Individual Preservation Management Plans
Continuing the preservation process with sound preservation planning is the next course of action. Prior to construction, it is essential to create a planning document outlining the significance of a historic building, documenting the qualities and elements that contribute to its historic character, establishing preservation priorities, and addressing how the building is to be treated. This type of plan is often called a "preservation management plan" or "Historic Structures Report." In government agencies, this type of document may also be referred to as an Integrated Cultural Resource Management Plan (ICRMP) and Building Preservation Plan (BPP). In addition, a "Cultural Landscape Report or Inventory" may also need to be prepared.
For additional information on preservation management plans, click here.
Federal regulation requires development of individual preservation management plans if the property is federally owned or uses federal funds. The plan can take many forms, but MUST include the following types of information:
- Key Historical Information (when, who, what, where)
- Archival Research (including historic drawings and photographs if available)
- Site Survey Information
- Statement of Significance
- Identification of Character Defining Features
- Documentation of Existing Conditions
- Captioned and Mapped Photos of Existing Conditions (interior and exterior)
- Description of Existing Physical Conditions (on the interior and exterior)
- Materials Analyses
- Overall Conditions Assessment
- Structural Analysis
- Fabric Analysis, Including Paint Analysis; Masonry
- Recommendations for Appropriate Treatments
- Future Compliance Requirements (where applicable as required by law)
The following types of information may be included in a preservation management plan or Historic Structures Report:
- Disaster Mitigation/Management Plan
- Preservation Maintenance Plan
- Establishment of Preservation Zones
- Design Concept (for preservation, rehabilitation, and restoration of building)
- Feasibility Study for Reuse of Building
- Narrative History of Use (construction campaigns, alterations, and additions)
- Description as Built
- Project Scope of Work and Specifications
- Structural Analysis
- Life-Cycle Analysis
Plan Suitable Spaces for Program Needs

This late 19th century hotel ballroom conversion into a parking garage is not a suitable use or program for this type of highly articulated finished space.
Courtesy of National Park Service
Preservation management plans identify character-defining qualities and establish preservation priorities for matching program functions to specific buildings or spaces. The goal is to make the best possible use of existing historic features, minimizing the need for interventions that might compromise the historic character of the building or site. Comprehensive planning is encouraged so that all changes, large or small, are part of a well-integrated building plan, as opposed to piecemeal alterations undertaken without regard to long-term effects.
Preservation zoning establishes a hierarchy based on architectural merit, historic significance, and historic integrity, or the extent to which original materials and design remain intact. These zone categories are then correlated to appropriate levels of treatment, in accordance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. The proportion of zones dictating a stricter vs. more lenient design approach is unique to each building. In some buildings, every space is highly significant and all changes must be taken with great care, under the guidance of an experienced preservation professional or team. Other buildings can accommodate greater change while still maintaining their historic character.
Buildings well matched to their tenants and functions require very little change. Whenever changing building occupancy or functions, seek uses and tenants suited to the building. Suitable uses are functions that minimize the need to alter character-defining features or spaces. The less modification required by the proposed program, the more suitable the program.
Accommodating new functions demands ingenuity. The success of which rests, to a great extent, upon the ability to successfully integrate old and new so that the property retains its historic character and the parts still relate to the whole.
In addressing changing space requirements, first consider options that enable the historic building to continue serving the function for which it was originally constructed. When the historic function is no longer viable, feasibility studies are undertaken to assess the financial and practical achievability of treatment options.
C. Design Development Stage
Design to Minimize Changes to Historic Property

Federal Courthouse, Scranton, PA. Adding an adjoining or freestanding annex has enabled many federal courts to remain in historic courthouse buildings, allowing continued public access to ceremonial courtrooms.
The underlying philosophy behind any preservation project is to keep to a minimum the proposed changes to a historic property. For its long-term protection, the historic property must always come first. Therefore, any changes should play a secondary role to the historic property and new work must not dictate what occurs on site. The role of the preservation design team or specialist is to help ensure that these changes contribute to, rather than detract from, a building's historic character and design unity.
If a historic property is on federal land or using federal funds and changes are proposed, the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) in which the property is located must be consulted to comply with Section 106. The Secretary of the Interior's Standards provide the framework for responsible preservation design. Technical guidance is available to help resolve common preservation challenges.
For more detailed design guidance, refer to the following WBDG pages:
- Update Building Systems Appropriately
- Accommodate Life Safety and Security Needs
- Comply with Accessibility Requirements
Select Competent and Qualified Contractors
Similar to the selection of the project team, the construction team should consist of qualified contractors and subcontractors with experience working on similar historic properties. Select contractors early enough to include them in developing solutions that meet the project goals (where the contract process so permits).
GSA has developed contract language and evaluation criteria to verify the competency of architectural and engineering firms, as well as, construction contractors that propose to work on historic buildings. GSA's preservation project management online guidance also includes a model scope of services for architectural and engineering design work involving historic buildings. For more information, visit the GSA Historic Buildings website.
D. Construction Stage
Provide Temporary Protection
Construction activity during the course of a project can damage historic resources. Therefore, providing temporary protection of a building or site during this time should be incorporated in planning and construction documents. On-site supervision with regular inspections ensures that historic fabric is not at risk. For additional information on temporary protection see the National Park Service TechNote section on Temporary Protection.
Ensure Fire Safety During Construction
Many historic buildings are destroyed as a result of fires during construction. Fire-safe clean-up, including removal of flammable solvents and rags and debris, is critical. Fire suppression systems must be maintained and augmented when appropriate. Leave pathways to exits clear, and ensure that fire doors remain closed. Additional supervision may be required while high risk construction activities are underway.
Educate Workers and Public on Significance of Historic Property
Educating everyone involved in the project—from the property owner, to the consultants (architectural, structural, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, civil), to the contractors and laborers, and to the eventual property users—about why the property is worthy of preservation is vitally important. The better informed one is the more likely one is to treat the property with care.
Regular on-site supervision and good communication between the preservation team and the construction team can protect a historic building while construction is underway. Sometimes features worthy of preservation are uncovered as work progresses and this can ensure these and other important elements are not compromised.
Wayside signs or exhibits describing construction/preservation work can generate interest in the project while building good will among tenants and visitors who are inconvenienced by construction. The costs of these installations can be offset by reduced effort required to respond to questions and complaints.
Develop Building Maintenance Manual
For the long-term protection of a historic resource, operational guidelines should be developed for not only tenants, but also for the building staff. These guidelines should provide:
- Documentation on building systems
- Facilities management programs to record important information on the operation of a building or property
- Schedules for cyclical maintenance and custodial procedures
- Schedules for regular inspections of important features
E. Occupancy Stage
Modify Leasing Agreements and Provisions
Tenants must know what they can and cannot do prior to leasing. This type of information may be included in leasing documents and through the development of tenant guidelines.
Historic properties must also be protected when tenants move in or relocate to a property. Transporting furniture and office equipment can often cause damage unless care is taken to protect important features during increased levels of activity. Once again, accommodations for temporary protection should be made early on in the planning process and in construction documents.
Leases should also include procedural guidance for Section106 compliance when alterations are unavoidable.
Develop Special Events Policies
Historic properties are often used for special events (e.g., exhibitions, exceptions, parties, demonstrations, etc.). These activities increase the wear and tear on a property and can damage an historic resource. Temporary protection of the architectural fabric and landscapes when equipment is moved in and out, and when the space is being used, should be provided. The following actions are recommended to minimize the effects of special events on the historic property:
- Confer with code officials to determine the types of activities that are appropriate for the space. Develop specific special events guidelines, noting that some activities are inappropriate for the property.
- Establish a permitting process when public or private buildings are leased for uses beyond their usual function, such as using a museum for a social event.
- Establish that lessees should submit in advance how they propose to use a historic property; some activities may be inappropriate.
- Determine beforehand who is responsible for protection and incidental damage as a result of leasing out a space. Consider mandatory security deposits.
- Ensure that the property (or lessee) is adequately insured to cover any damage.
- Ensure that appropriate on-site supervision is present throughout the event and clean-up.
Update Individual Preservation Management Plans
Technical guidance provided in the preservation management plans and other preservation plans should be periodically updated to ensure that the plans reflect current conditions. Updating also ensures that recommendations take into account technical advancements in treatment technologies that may have occurred since the plan was initially created. Updates should be undertaken by a specialist firm meeting the Department of Interior qualification standards, preferably by the firm who prepared the original plan.
Relevant Codes and Standards
Federal Mandates
- 16 U.S.C. 470 et seq. National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended through 1992
- Section 106, 36 CFR Part 800, Protection of Historic Properties
- Section 110
Standards and Guidelines
- National Historic Landmark Designation
- National Park Service, Caring for Your Historic Building
- Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties
- National Register Nomination Process
- Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Cultural Landscapes
- Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Buildings
- Standards and Guidelines also exist for: archaeology, maritime resources, and other cultural resources
Federal
- General Services Administration Historic Preservation Technical Procedures
State/Local
- Contact your State Historic Preservation Officer
Codes
- 1997 Uniform Code for Building Conservation
- 2001 Maryland Building Rehabilitation Code
- 2003 International Building Code
- California Historic Building Code (2001)
- HUD's Guideline on Fire Ratings of Archaic Materials and Assemblies
- Massachusetts Building Code Section 780 CMR 3409.0 (2000)—Historic Building exceptions
- New Jersey Rehabilitation Sub-Code (1999)
- Uniform Code for Building Conservation by International Code Council.
- International Conference of Building Officials, 1997.
- Refer also to Section A. of this page Determine the Regulations, Guidelines, and Applicable Codes That Will Affect the Proposed Work
- Vermont Department of Labor and Industry's Fire Prevention and Building Code Compliance for Historic Buildings: A Field Guide
Major Resources
WBDG
Historic Preservation—Additional Resources
Publications
General
- For more information about the preservation field in the United States please see the ICOMOS Document, A Brief Overview of Preservation in the USA
- Conservation of Historic Buildings, Third Edition (Conservation of Historic Buildings) by Bernard Feilden. Architectural Press: July 2003.
- National Park Service, National Register Bulletins and Brochures
- Note #1: Eight Guiding Principles in the Conservation of Historic Properties Architectural Conservation Notes. Ontario Ministry of Citizenship, Culture, and Recreation.
Codes
- Building Codes for Heritage Buildings Heritage Society of British Columbia—Examples of historic building codes and some code exceptions.
- Smart Codes: A New Approach to Building Codes by Elizabeth G. Pianca. Forum News: May/June 2001, Vol.7, No. 5.
Technical Guidance
- Association for Preservation Technology International (APTI) Bulletin
- Conservation of Historic Buildings, Third Edition by Bernard Feilden. Boston, MA: Architectural Press, 2003.
- Conserving Buildings: Guide to Techniques and Materials, Revised Edition. Martin E. Weaver. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1997.
- Cultural Landscapes Charrette Background Paper
- English Heritage Publications
- GSA Preservation Note Series
- Historic Scotland Technical Publications
- National Park Service National Center for Preservation Technology and Training (NCPTT)
- National Park Service, Preservation Brief Series
Investigation
- House Histories: A Guide to Tracing the Genealogy of Your Home by Sally Light and Margaret Eberle (Illustrator). Golden Hill Press, September 1989.
- Preservation Brief 35—Understanding Old Buildings: The Process of Architectural Investigation by Travis C. McDonald, Jr. National Park Service, 1994.
- Specifying Buildings, A Design Management Perspective by Stephen Emmitt and David T. Yeomans. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2001.
Preservation Management Plans
- The Conservation Easement Handbook: Managing Land Conservation and Historic Preservation Easement Programs by Diehl, Janet, Barrett, Thomas S. Land Trust Alliance.
- CRM (Cultural Resources Management Bulletin) Issue 1984 7-01, Page 15: Historic Structures Report (PDF 94 KB, 29 pgs) by Frances Joan Mathien.
- A Historic Structure Report Symposium Proceedings by Lonnie J. Hovey. The American Institute of Architects Press, October 1996.
- House Histories: A Guide to Tracing the Genealogy of Your Home. Sally Light, Margaret Eberle (Illustrator). Golden Hill Press, September 1989.
- Preservation Plan for the Cruiser Olympia—Example of an individualized preservation plan
- Specifying Buildings, A Design Management Perspective, Stephen Emmitt, David T. Yeomans. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2001.
- What is Preservation Planning? (As it pertains to collections.) Sherelyn Ogden. Northeast Document Conservation Center.
Special Events Policies
- The Lincoln Memorial: Guidelines for Special Events and Demonstration, December 1996 by National Park Service, National Capital Parks-Central (NACC). Washington, DC, December 1996.—available through the National Park Service, Lincoln Memorial Park or National Capital Region Office.
- Understanding Old Buildings; The Process of Architectural Investigation. Preservation Brief 35 by Travis C. McDonald, Jr. National Park Service, 1994.
Training
- Advisory Council for Historic Preservation 106 Training
- National Council for Preservation Education
- National Preservation Institute, Historic Structures Reports: A Management Tool for Historic Properties—Seminar
- National Preservation Institute, Preservation Maintenance: Understanding and Preserving Historic Buildings—Seminar
